Biden Administration Challenges Texas Immigration Law

The Biden Administration sued Texas and Governor Greg Abbott over a law allowing the detention and expulsion of undocumented migrants. This legal action has sparked debates about potential constitutional violations of federal authority.

DOJ Challenges Texas Immigration Law in Wednesday Lawsuit

The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday, argues that the Texan law infringes on federal authority and seeks its nullification before it takes effect in March. The Department of Justice contends that Texas lacks the power to manage its own immigration system.

Abbott’s Social Media Response

Abbott, who endorsed the law last month, responded on Twitter: “Biden sued me today for enacting a law making it illegal for an illegal immigrant to enter Texas directly from a foreign nation. I am optimistic about my prospects.”

Criminalizing Unauthorized Crossings

The Texan legislation, passed in November, makes it a crime to cross from Mexico to Texas outside designated entry points. It empowers state and local law enforcement to arrest those crossing illegally and allows local judges to order expulsion instead of criminal prosecution.

Biden Administration Challenges Texas Law on Immigration Authority

The lawsuit relies on the 2012 Supreme Court case, Arizona v. United States, asserting that exclusive authority over immigration and national borders resides with the federal government. The Biden administration argues that Texas’ new law interferes with that authority, affecting border operations and foreign relations.

Support from Legal Experts and International Concerns

Legal experts support the lawsuit, stating that the Texan law clearly violates federal authority. Furthermore, Texas’ plan to deport all expelled migrants to Mexico, irrespective of nationality, raises international relations concerns.

Border Conflict and Previous Disputes

This legal clash is the latest development in the escalating power struggle between Texas and the federal government on border issues. Additional disputes include Texas installing barbed wire and a 1,000-foot floating barrier in the Rio Grande, both contested by federal authorities.

Get a 70% discount on a 5-year subscription to WSJ Digital

Defining State vs. Federal Authority in Immigration Matters

The resolution of this legal battle could carry substantial implications for U.S. immigration policy. It could establish key precedents for the balance of authority between state and federal entities in immigration.

The Biden Administration’s legal challenge against Texas’ immigration law raises crucial questions about federal versus state authority, impacting national policy, in review with Wall St Jnl.