Sep
Kamala Harris debate strategy demonstrated against Donald Trump on Tuesday, showcasing her presidential-level skills. Her approach was marked by a composed delivery of crafted jabs, highlighting her ability to navigate a high-stakes political environment with studied detachment. Despite the familiar nature of her criticisms, she executed her strategy with precision, maintaining a professional demeanor throughout.
Familiar Criticisms and Fabrications
Harris’s debate performance was notable for her reliance on well-known criticisms of Trump, including allegations such as his supposed endorsement of neo-Nazis and his inflammatory rhetoric about violence. For many viewers, these points were recycled and somewhat predictable, based on longstanding criticisms that Trump has faced. Notably, Harris avoided reiterating her claim about Trump’s alleged failure to alert Americans about COVID-19 following a January 28, 2020, White House briefing.
Kamala Harris’ debate strategy felt recycled and predictable, lacking fresh critique or insight, according to wsj news.
Avoiding the Full Assault on COVID-19
In her debate performance, Harris chose not to launch a direct assault regarding the handling of COVID-19. Instead, she subtly implied that Trump’s approach contributed to America’s COVID-19 challenges. This strategy mirrored a familiar Harris maneuver, particularly considering the Biden-Harris administration’s continuation of Trump’s hardline stance on China. However, Harris did not aggressively pursue the lab-leak theory that Trump had promoted, which she had previously seemed to endorse.
Searching for Genuine Judgment
Despite Harris’s intelligent presentation, there remains a quest for evidence of genuine judgment in her policy perspectives. Although she displays a notable level of intelligence, there is a lingering uncertainty about her ability to articulate well-informed, realistic policies. Her debate performance and previous interviews have not fully dispelled concerns about her depth of insight.
Harris Defends Evolving Policies in First Major TV Interview
Harris’ first interview reaffirmed her core values on climate change and immigration, despite evolving policies. In her and Minnesota Gov…
Trump’s Predictable Responses
During the debate, Trump’s responses were as expected, lacking the ability to sidestep Harris’s predictable attacks. Despite the challenges posed by Harris, Trump could rely on his record of peace, prosperity, and rising wages prior to the pandemic. This record provided a buffer against Harris’s critiques, even though she aimed to highlight his shortcomings.
The AI Chip Analogy
Harris’s performance impressed with its strategic execution but was not groundbreaking. The 2017 AI chip analogy might have provoked similar Trump responses. Her team’s ability to elicit specific Trump reactions seemed lacking in a well-defined plan. This limitation may have reduced the overall impact of her debate strategy.
Evaluating Harris’s Shrewdness
Harris’s debate performance showed ruthlessness but lacked introspective intelligence and conviction. Voters seek a president with genuine, dynamic shrewdness. Harris’s effectiveness didn’t address her ability to handle complex situations realistically. Trump’s presidency, with its successes and failures, presents a record of shrewd decision-making that Harris has yet to match.
Get unrestricted access to The Economist and The Wall Street Journal Digital with a 2-year subscription. Enjoy daily news, The Economist Today, The Economist Weekly, archives, and more. Access on iOS, Android, PC, and Mac. Sign up now for a 77% discount.