U.S. Real Estate Compensation Practices Transform Today

Today, August 17, marks a significant shift in U.S. real estate practices as a class-action settlement addressing industry compensation goes into effect. The settlement introduces new rules affecting the paperwork consumers complete at the beginning of the buying or selling process. These technical changes could substantially shift how agents are compensated, potentially reducing commissions and altering power dynamics in real estate transactions.

Current Practices and Expected Changes

Traditionally, real estate agents charged a 5% or 6% fee, split between the buyer and seller. New rules are expected to disrupt this model. Stephen Brobeck, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America, says the settlement aims to level the negotiating field. Many consumers lack knowledge about fair commission rates. While they can reasonably expect a 2% commission, they might sometimes negotiate it down to 1.5%.

The new rules could lower U.S. real estate commissions and balance the negotiating power for consumers, according to wsj news.

Historical Context and Legal Actions

The U.S. real estate compensation system has faced criticism for high commissions. Complaints grew until a Missouri jury found the NAR guilty of colluding to maintain these high fees. The Department of Justice also challenged the system, advocating for separate handling of buyer and seller commissions. This resistance to change highlights ongoing debates about fairness and transparency in real estate transactions.

In March, the NAR settled the lawsuit, disrupting the industry significantly. Experts predict a 30% cost reduction, but worry about brokerages exploiting loopholes.

U.K. Economy Shows Unexpected Strength in First Half of 2024

The U.K. economy demonstrated surprising resilience in the first half of 2024, growing faster than many anticipated…

Implementation and Effects

NAR President Kevin Sears acknowledged that the full impact of these changes will take time to evaluate, with regulators closely monitoring the situation. Historically, agents set their fees with minimal resistance, often negotiating commissions with sellers who then split the fee with buyers’ agents. This fee was deducted from the sale proceeds, providing sellers little incentive to negotiate and buyers minimal influence over the commission.

Under the new rules, sellers can no longer specify the commission for the buyer’s agent in listing forms. Furthermore, buyer’s agents must now enter into written agreements with clients outlining their commission from the beginning.

State-Level Insights and Future Projections

Some states, like New Jersey and Indiana, have already implemented similar changes. Jake Johnson, a broker with Redfin Corp. in Indianapolis, noted that if sellers refuse to cover buyer commissions, property visits and bids could decrease, potentially lowering sale prices. Sellers may opt to cover buyer commissions if it results in better offers.

Ryan Tomasello, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, noted that buyers negotiating lower fees might gain market competitiveness. Redfin reported a drop in average compensation for buyers’ agents, from 2.62% to 2.55%. This decrease suggests agents may be accepting lower fees due to market challenges. The trend highlights shifts in agent compensation amid evolving market conditions.

Future Expectations

While Brobeck does not anticipate a dramatic reduction in commissions, he envisions a future with base rates of 1% to 1.5% for buyers and sellers, with additional fees for premium services. It remains uncertain whether buyers’ agents will accept lower compensation willingly, especially as top agents may resist reduced fees given the unchanged scope of services.

Get a 2-year subscription with unrestricted access to The Economist and The Wall Street Journal Digital. Enjoy daily news, The Economist Today, The Economist Weekly, archives, and more on iOS, Android, PC, and Mac. Sign up now and save 77%!